My first challenge had to do with the ordination process. John Simpson brought two papers written by two candidates for ordination. The appeared to be almost identical with only minor changes. The subject of the papers had to do with what the candidate I learned about himself or herself, as well as their concepts for ministry, during their process for ordination.
“Here are two papers required for your new ordination process. Does not look like these two candidates are taking this assignment very seriously,” John said.
I thought that John Simpson had been replaced on the Diocesan Commission on Ministry. Apparently he believes that he still has ownership of the Commission. How does one think they have ownership of something to which they have devoted so little time and attention? Isn’t the role of anyone who is in ministry, the role of a servant? John had done so little on the Commission, yet he seemed to seek validation every now and then through some crisis he was solving that no one else could do.
“Thanks John, I will look into it. You are right about at least one of these candidates. It looks like one copied from the other,” I said. I found out later that John was not serving on the Commission, but someone that was showed the two papers to him.
The two candidates were Mark Vest and Paul Harding. I managed to call both of them in for a conference with me. It was a mystery to me how one of them was able to see the paper of the other, unless someone on the Commission showed it to him.
I went straight to the concern. “Gentlemen, thanks for coming in to talk with me. The Commission on Ministry has raised questions about the recent paper you were required to submit, concerning your call to ministry and how the Commission has assisted you along the way. The papers are very much alike, leading the Commission to believe that one of you may have plagiarized from the other, “
Both of the candidates seemed very surprised. One of them must be a very good actor.
“Mark, I will start with you. Did you write your paper?”
“Yes Dean, he answered.
“How did you formulate your thoughts,” I asked.
“Well, I read an article you had written on the process for ordination and it raised important issues for me,” he said.
“That’s interesting. I would say that you have written a good paper. I am not going to take any credit for it despite what you have said,” I replied.
Mark laughed a little. “In fact, we are considering that your paper might be published in the next diocesan newsletter. Would that be alright with you?”
“Sure,” he said.
“Good. Now Paul, I am going to ask you the same question. How did you formulate your thoughts.”
“I prayed a lot and did a lot soul-searching. The paper gave me the opportunity to help galvanize some of my experience in the process and how it has affected me,” Paul replied.
“There was a requirement in the assignment to say where you thought the direction of our church may be heading. You did not write very much about that,” I said.
“Well, I think the direction needs to radically change,”he said.
“And yet you did not mention that.”
“I was afraid my answer could jeopardize my chances for ordination. I thought it better to use another platform to express my views on the direction of the church. And to be honest, I am still formulating my thinking on it,” he said.
“How about you, Mark. You did not write very much about the future direction of the church either,” I asked.
“In my view, there is no need for any radical change. You did not really cover the topic in your paper either, Dean,” Mark replied.
“My paper had a different purpose than yours, Mark. It was a technical paper on organization and procedure.” I said. “Paul, would you mind if the diocese published your paper,” I asked.
“Well, I would rather you did not,” he said.
“Why is that?”
“Some of the information is personal. I didn’t mind sharing it with the Commission. I am not sure other people in the diocese should be reading it. It was my impression that the paper should be held in confidence. I am a work in progress. I may change my thinking and opinion on certain issues in the future,” Paul said.
“You do not sound very confident in your call,” Mark interjected.
“Are you confident in your call,” I asked Mark.
“Sure. I have been confident from the very beginning,” he replied.
“And what gives you that confidence,” I asked.
“Well, I have always been confident about things. As something as important as the ordained ministry, why would that be an exception?”
“And yet you expressed some concerns on your paper,” I said.
“Oh that, I was thinking that the Commission expected to see something like that to validate their work,” he said.
At this point I dismissed both candidates and told them to wait in the hall for a brief time. I then prayed and asked God for his wisdom. I had pretty much come to a decision on the matter. The Lord gave me peace about it, but the Spirit reminded me to speak the truth in love. I then called Mark back into my office alone.
“Mark, I do not believe that you have been a sincere and truthful candidate for ordination. It seems to me that you just say what you think people want to hear you say. If you truly have confidence in your call to ministry why not fully enter into the process of exploration? Our confidence in ministry is not in ourselves. It must be in God alone. That is why we need to draw closer to him each day. If we are not going to be truthful with people, how will we be able to be truthful with God? I am going to recommend that the Commission delay your candidacy. I could be wrong about you. They will make the final decision. But if you are willing to see me for counseling and to confess your apparent deception to the Commission, there might be a path for you in the future. But not at this time. We are all a work in progress. My hope is that God may be able to use your mightily for his ministry in the future.”
Mark was shaken. He strongly stated that the paper was his and that he had been honest with the Commission. His hope was that they would keep him on. I said, “That is my hope as well, at least for the future. I trust the Commission will be as fair with you be and supportive as possible.”
Mark was eventually dismissed from the ordination process, but the seminary decided that they would still allow Mark to attend his classes and complete his education. However, Mark decided to drop out of school and explore another path. I pray for him regularly.
Toward the end of my service as interim bishop a more serous crisis arose. You might say it was a crisis in theology as well as ministry. A few of the old school pastors wanted to meet with me together. They said that they were concerned about the direction i was taking in ministry. I called them old school, not because of their age, but for their entrenched ideas about what was and what was not acceptable for the church when it came to worship. They would probably think of themselves as traditional. But to me, they gave the word traditional a bad name. I would describe them as creatures of habit, no matter how wrong the habit might be.
Naturally, the ring leader was John Simpson. When I say ring leader, I am talking about a three ring circus. But I graciously agreed to meet with them and give them every opportunity to express their views. Perhaps I could learn some useful information from them. I needed to keep an open mind.
On the day of the agreed upon meeting, twelve men showed up. That is when I realized that they were very serious their concern. John Simpson said that he had been appointed as the group’s spokesperson.
“Thank you for agreeing to meet with us,” John said. “We have been very concerned about the direction the diocese now seems to be taking that we do not think represents our traditional understand of the faith.”
“Thank you all for coming. I am glad we have this opportunity to explore the faith together. We need to be doing more of this,” I said. I was trying to avoid it, but the political language of the bishop was beginning to creep in. Maybe bishops need to be a little political, I was beginning to think
“What is your primary concern?”
“We do not thing you are following the tradition of our church,” John said.
“Traditions are help us keep the faith that was handed down to us,”I said.
“Precisely,” John said emphatically. “In fact, tradition came before the writing of the Bible.”
“Well, that certainly true of the Early Church in some ways. They did not have the New Testament. They were following many of the traditions of the synagogue. And the New Testament writings of the faith came out of their experience. These experiences and understandings were codified in the New Testament.
“That is why we are a stickler for traditions,” John replied.
“But would you not say that scripture is just as important as tradition?”
“I believe it is, especially if they are in agreement,” John answered.
I added, “Scripture is very reliable, is it not? The Apostle Paul wrote:
All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God[a] may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.
2 Timothy 3:16-17
‘All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness, so that the servant of God[a] may be thoroughly equipped for every good work.’
So scripture should be in agreement with everything that God is doing, even in the church, and especially in the church. Would you agree?
John looked a little puzzled at first, but then he shook his head. I looked around the room and all members of the group were shaking their heard in agreement.
“Now Jesus instituted some traditions that were not in the synagogue. Take Holy Communion for an example. That was brand new, wasn’t it. He shared it with his disciples the night before his crucifixion.”
“That gets us around to what we want to take about. We do not like the way you are teaching and celebrating the Communion,” John said.
Someone from the group added, “We used to observe it monthly and now it is weekly. It makes the worship service too long.”
Another person joked, “All those Baptists get ahead of us in the restaurants.”
Everyone laughed. I was a little embarrassed that I did too. We certainly have no right to ridicule or lampoon the Baptists.
“Well, it is implied in the Book of Acts that the Communion was celebrated quite often,” I added. “But you are here to talk more about the service that how often it is held, are you not?”
“Precisely, we do not believe that Jesus is in the bread of Communion. Communion is simply a memorial service. We remember that Jesus died for us,” John said.
“None of that Hocus Pocus,” someone said.
I said, “You may be referring to the phrase ‘hoc est corpus meum,’ the Latin translation of the phrase ‘this is my body.’ Jesus used this phrase when he was passing out the Communion bread to his disciples.”
“Well. we do not actually believe that Jesus was talking about his real body or his real blood. He was just saying that the elements of Communion should remind us of his body and blood,” John said.
“I understand, it is a matter of interpretation. Would you be will to run an experiment? We could take someone out of the pew who was untrained in the use of the Bible and its interpretation and just ask that person what he thinks. We could read a little of the scripture concerning the Communion and ask them to interpret it. He or she would not have any preconceived notions about it. Might this person be more likely to gain a common understanding of the Communion than coming some writing in a commentary by a New Testament critic,” i suggested.
“I am surprised you suggested this, coming from a theologian,” John said. “This would be right down my alley. What do you guys think.”
“Sure, we would be willing to give it a try,” was the consensus.
“I have an idea. We could bring in the bishop’s gardener. He probably does not have any training in the matter, and he is close at hand,” I suggested. We could read him some scriptures concerning the Communion and ask him what he thinks.”
“What do you guys think,” John asked.
After a brief huddled they all signals that they were in agreement.
“If we have the time, we could bring him in now,” I suggested.
“Bring him in, John said. “But we get to ask him some questions before we start the real questioning, right?”
“That is fine with me,” I said.
Fortunately we were able to locate Tony quickly. He was sprucing up the garden and had his work clothes on. Perfect. Tony had no idea what I was doing, but he caught on almost immediately. what was going on.
“OK Tony, what is your job around the cathedral,” John asked.
“I do some gardening and light maintenance.”
“Are you a member of this church?” John asked.
“No.”
“Are you a member of our denomination?” John asked.
“No.”
“Do you go to church here?” John asked.
“Sometimes.”
“Where do you go to church most of the time.” John asked.
“I like to attend many of the local churches.”
“Why move around?” John asked.
“Well, I like to catch the vibe of different churches.
“Catch the vibe? I see. Have you ever gone to any of the Dean’s teachings?” John asked.
“No. But I heard they were good.”
“Have you ever attended any teachings or activities here?” John asked.
Well I went to the Deans’s wife’s Bible a few times. Sarah is my friend. She is nice to me. It get’s lonely for me around here sometimes. I like to talk to her.
“Did you learn anything in her Bible study?” John asked.
“Yeah, I try to learn new things every day.”
“That’s nice. OK Tony, I am going to read something from the Bible for you and I would like your thoughts. I need to get your vibe on it.” John said.
“Sure. I love the Bible.”
John said, “Here goes.
For I received from the Lord that which I also delivered to you: that the Lord Jesus on the same night in which He was betrayed took bread; and when He had given thanks, He broke it and said, ‘Take, eat; this is My body which is broken for you; do this in remembrance of Me.’
1 Corinthians 11:23-25
What does that mean to you?”
“I think Jesus was preparing his disciples for his death,” Tony replied.
“What does he mean, in remembrance of Me?” John asked.
“He wanted his disciples to remember?”
“Great, Tony. Good answer!” John said.
“I did good?” Tony asked.
“Yeah, sure. Your turn, Dean,” John replied.
I shared this scripture,
“Jesus said to them, ‘I am the bread of life. Whoever comes to me will never be hungry, and whoever believes in me will never be thirsty.”
John 6:35
“What does the mean, Tony?”
“It sounds something like feeding on Jesus.”
“Wait a minute. That is from the Gospel of John. John never even mentions the Communion in his Gospel,” John said.
“Well, I just wanted Tony to listen to these words from John,” I said. “Here’s another verse, Tony. Jesus said:
‘I am the bread of life. Your ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness, and they died. This is the bread that comes down from heaven, so that one may eat of it and not die. I am the living bread that came down from heaven. Whoever eats of this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.’
John 6:48-51
What do you think that means?” I asked.
“Jesus’ bread gives life?” Tony answered.
“What about this one?
So Jesus said to them, ‘Very truly, I tell you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no life in you. Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood have eternal life, and I will raise them up on the last day; for my flesh is true food and my blood is true drink. Those who eat my flesh and drink my blood abide in me, and I in them. Just as the living Father sent me, and I live because of the Father, so whoever eats me will live because of me. This is the bread that came down from heaven, not like that which your ancestors ate, and they died. But the one who eats this bread will live forever.’
John 6:52-58
What does that mean to you?” I asked.
“It means I need to eat on some Jesus big time,” Tony replied.
“Wait a minute. Isn’t Jesus just saying that we should remember him just like the Israelites remembered the manna in the wilderness?” John asked.
“I don’t know. It sounds like to me that he is saying that his body is real food to eat and his blood is a real drink. But what do I know? I am just a simple man,” Tony replied.
“OK, you can go now, Tony,” John said.
“Thanks for coming in, Tony,” I added
“Sure Boss,” he replied.
As Tony was leaving the room, I could see that most of the members of the group were agitated. John looked the most upset.
“Wait a minute, This whole thing was a setup. There is something that is not smelling right here,” John said.
“Was Tony trying to confuse us,” I asked?
“Never mind Tony. He’s nothing. You just manipulated him,” John said.
“But I just read scripture,” I replied.
“Yeah, you read out of the Gospel of John, which is hard to understand. The average person is not going to get John,” John stated. “I don’t ever get John. We need to stick with what we know.”
All the rest of the meeting was downhill. It was like someone peered over the edge of a cliff. He got too close and fell headlong over it.
“You have not heard the last of this,” John said, as he and most of his group stormed out.
“Well, maybe we can bring it up again when the bishop returns. I am just a temporary filling in for him,” I said.
A couple of pastors did remain behind to thank me for the teaching. They said they wanted to hear more and asked if I could do a class on the Communion. There were other skirmishes along the way, but this one was the major one. I am now going home for a nap on the couch, first stopping to thank Tony for being a simple man.